Short answer
Map where requests come from, how they are classified, who decides the next step, and where data is copied by hand. Then define the first automation or internal-system phase.
Guide
For companies where requests arrive by email, forms, or phone and are then sorted, copied, and handed over manually.
Manual request handling can work for a while. The problem starts when volume grows, more people get involved, and information begins to disappear between email, spreadsheets, and notes.
Automation is useful when it shortens repeated steps, lowers the error rate, and gives sales and delivery one shared view of each request.
Map where requests come from, how they are classified, who decides the next step, and where data is copied by hand. Then define the first automation or internal-system phase.
Start with the current process, losses, and risks. Only then does it make sense to design the first technical phase.
The most common mistake is starting with a tool or a large scope before the real operational impact is clear.
A strong result is not another system for its own sake. It is less manual work, clearer ownership, and a first phase with measurable value.
No. It is often better to start with intake, classification, and handover into the next step.
It depends on the process. CRM may be enough for tracking, while a custom system helps when requests tightly connect to offers, delivery, or internal workflow.
Yes, but the rules, validation, and human-review points need to be explicit.
Next step
A short description of the current process and the manual work is enough to continue.